The Jalen Duren stalemate no longer hangs over the head of the Detroit Pistons, but the drama is far from over. A lot has been swept under the rug as the Pistons focus on the 2026-27 season, but the tensions between the two sides may rear their head further down the line.
As more details emerge about what transpired between the Pistons and the All-Star center during the offseason, Duren's feelings become more understandable. It has been reported that Duren felt disrespected throughout the negotiations, not necessarily only because of the finances of the offers, but also because of the way the organization saw him.
On Friday, ESPN's Vincent Goodwill wrote that Duren was told in negotiations that he was "the team's fourth-best player," which was apparently a big source of frustration.
Trajan Langdon's Jalen Duren approach is emblematic of a bigger Pistons problem
Of course, this could be a negotiating tactic by the front office, but it's just so removed from reality that any player would be right to be angry. There were initial reports that the Pistons value Ausar Thompson more. That is ridiculous to begin with, given the fact that Duren played at a far higher level, including making the All-Star and All-NBA team last season.
Even if the Pistons think Thompson is better, finding another player who even has an argument for being better than Duren is impossible. Claiming that one of John Collins, Duncan Robinson, Ron Holland, or Paul Reed is better than Duren would understandably make him furious.
Why would you consistently tell a 22-year-old player you want to build around and pay $40 million per year that he is not that good?
This is emblematic of GM Trajan Langdon's problematic approach. It's one thing to understand the business side of things and approach negotiations in a professional manner. It's another thing to remove emotions from it entirely.
At the end of the day, you are still dealing with human beings. If they feel like you are consistently undervaluing and disrespecting them, getting a good deal will not matter. Because you won't be getting the most out of them anyway.
Plus, this strategy didn't even work. Did the Pistons really get a much better deal when signing Duren? After his playoff struggles, $40 million per year was widely considered a fair market value. In fact, I predicted a five-year, $205 million contract for Duren at the start of the offseason. Langdon spent all offseason playing hardball and squeezing every dollar out of Duren, only to eventually sign him to a fair market value.
This wasn't the greatest work of negotiating from Langdon. Following a largely underwhelming offseason from the Pistons front office, this was less than ideal. This should raise alarm bells for Pistons fans, even with Duren seemingly happy to be back in the fold.
Add us as a preferred source on Google